Thames Water should go into administration, investor says

Simon JackBusiness editor
News imageReuters Blurry people in hi-vis safety gear and white helmets stand in the foreground, in front of a white van with a blue Thames Water logo.Reuters

Thames Water should be put into administration rather than "sleepwalking" into a deal that is bad for customers, according to a Hong Kong-based investor who wants to buy the business.

Thames Water is set to run out of cash within 12 months without a rescue deal.

A group of its existing lenders has offered to write off over 30% of its debt and inject billions in new money but want leniency from future pollution fines. Hong Kong's CKI Holdings Limited want to table a rival bid.

The government has consistently said it would prefer "a market-based solution" and said it could not comment on ongoing negotiations.

The group of lenders said CKI already had a chance to buy Thames Water.

The government said it would put the utility in administration "if that were to become necessary".

The BBC understands that a decision by regulator Ofwat on whether to recommend to government that lenders to the company take ownership of the troubled utility is still under discussion with a "variety of opinions" from board members and a decision expected this summer.

CKI Holdings insists that Thames Water's 16 million customers would be better served by allowing it to collapse into administration so that they – and others – could submit new bids to buy and revive the debt-ridden company.

The firm's co-managing director Andy Hunter said CKI, which already owns 75% of Northumbrian Water, has a proven track record in owning critical utilities.

"I think the next owner of Thames Water should be an experienced, credible, long-term focused operator with the expertise and the resources to fix Thames Water," he said.

"But we seem to be sleepwalking into a conclusion that will result in the next owner of Thames Water – having, doubtless, many attributes – having none of these attributes."

Thames Water is, in effect, controlled by a majority of its lenders who are owed nearly £18bn.

They are offering to write off over a quarter of that debt and inject now money in return for some leniency over future fines for missing pollution and leak targets in the future.

Hunter says that would be a bad outcome for Thames customers.

"They would appear to be negotiating and demanding a whole raft of regulatory concessions, which which cast doubt on the integrity of the regulation, and ultimately will be to a cost to the consumer. I think that is a very, very bad solution."

The consortium of lenders, now known as London and Valley Water, has the backing of the Thames Water board.

The lenders told the BBC that CKI had its chance to make a good offer for Thames during a bidding process run by the investment bank Rothschilds but failed to present a competitive bid.

"London & Valley Water has submitted to Ofwat a further improved proposal for the turnaround and recapitalisation of Thames Water. Experienced investors would provide up to £10 billion of new private capital to stabilise and transform Thames Water"

The government has consistently said it would prefer "a market-based solution" and said it could not comment on ongoing negotiations.

The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs said: "The government will always act in the national interest on these issues.

"The company remains financially stable, but we stand ready for all eventualities, including applying for a special administration regime if that were to become necessary."