Development of 400 homes could 'save dying town'

News imageLeret Group A computer-generated image shows the proposed Bull Hill redevelopment in Leatherhead. Several multi-storey apartment buildings surround a large landscaped green space with footpaths winding through it. Trees, planting areas and seating are spread across the site, while small groups of people are shown walking, sitting and using the open space. Balconies are visible on the residential buildings and a large mature tree stands in the centre of the development.Leret Group
Councillors clashed over the plans for 400 homes in the town

A controversial 400-home development is the best way to save Leatherhead from "dying", a councillor has said.

The comments came during a debate at Mole Valley District Council over the proposed Bull Hill regeneration scheme, which has faced opposition from some residents.

Independent councillor Gerry Sevenoaks raised concerns about traffic and lengthy building works and said some of the financial and community benefits originally put forward had been reduced.

Councillors defending the scheme said there was a strong silent majority in favour of the scheme and it was not raised as a major issue by residents during the local elections, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service.

Liberal Democrat councillor Claire Malcomson said: "Whatever happens it will improve Leatherhead because Leatherhead, as mentioned, is a dying town, and it needs improvement.

"It needs more housing to feed the shops, and entertainment, and the theatre, and that is the whole point of it.

"Yes, some things have had to be cut back because the climate has changed, but I do think ultimately Leatherhead will benefit from this."

Sevenoaks had said the project, a joint venture between the council and Kier Property, would lead to increased traffic congestion and building works over several years, adding: "It will look like carnage."

He said the development originally included affordable housing, social housing, a refurbished Swan Centre, a cinema and financial profit for investment in the town, but the benefits had diminished.

"The profit share is down from £22m to £14m, reduced car parking, and no cinema or leisure facilities, and we see there is no social housing," he said.

Follow BBC Surrey on Facebook, X, and on Instagram and listen to BBC Radio Surrey on Sounds. Send your story ideas to southeasttoday@bbc.co.uk or WhatsApp us on 08081 002250.