Saudi-US deal different to US's typical nuclear energy agreementspublished at 20:59 BST

20:59 BST

Gary O'Donoghue
Chief North America correspondent

This looks set to be a 30-year deal between the US and Saudi Arabia, to build civil nuclear capacity, potentially bringing in tens of billions of dollars for US firms.

But it's a different kind of deal to traditional US commercial nuclear agreements.

What is being widely reported is that Saudi Arabia might not be subject to the normal "gold standards" the US has previously demanded of partner countries in terms of inspections and, in particular, the non-enrichment of uranium on the host country's soil.

So, this is a different kind of deal that the US is proposing, and the reason they are pushing for it - particularly now - is that Russia and China have been knocking on the door and the US simply did not want to miss out.

It's a deal that’s been in the offing for some time - the Biden administration had pursued something similar; though that deal had been tied to Saudi Arabia normalising relations with Israel.

That link seems now to have been dropped by the Trump White House.

There's been no formal announcement yet, but when it comes, expect Israel to express its displeasure.

Image source, Reuters

US President Donald Trump has just started speaking at a high school in Atlanta, Georgia.

We're listening in to see if he is speaks about the reported US-Saudi Arabia nuclear deal, and will bring you any relevant updates.

Image source, Getty Images

If you're just joining us, we're still expecting the US and Saudi Arabia to announce an nuclear power deal.

US media has reported that the two countries have reached a commercial agreement for US companies to run nuclear power plants on Saudi Arabian soil, but we've not had anything yet on the matter from President Trump or Saudi officials.

Reports suggest the deal will potentially allow Saudi Arabia to enrich uranium itself.

It would be the latest milestone in a Saudi-US negotiations on nuclear that have been ongoing ever since the two nations signed an memorandum of understanding in 2008.

Back in the US, Democrat representative John Garamendi described the deal as "terrible, terrible policy", while Republican Marlin Stutzman said he had no "initial" concerns over the agreement.

The highly controversial agreement will need to be debated in congress but opponents are unlikely to be able to gather enough votes to defeat Trump's initiative, our North America editor Sarah Smith writes.

We expect Trump to soon be speaking at a high school in Atlanta, Georgia, for an unrelated event, but we will bring you any relevant lines.

Stick with us, and we'll provide updates on any breaking news as soon as it occurs.

Image source, Reuters

Nuclear is one of the key issues at stake between the US and Iran in the ongoing conflict in the Middle East.

At the end of February, in the midst of ongoing US-Iran nuclear talks, the US and Israel launched a bombing campaign on Tehran, which responded by launching missiles and drones to American Gulf allies.

The conflict resulted in Iran effectively closing the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world's busiest oil shipping channels, and the US blockading Iranian ports.

US President Donald Trump has repeatedly said the US is seeking to destroy Iran's ballistic missile capabilities and its ability to develop nuclear weapons - Iran has consistently maintained its nuclear activities are entirely peaceful.

The two countries signed a Memorandum of Understanding in June to halt military operations and reopen the Strait of Hormuz, including a commitment from both sides to further talks to reach a final agreement and a promise from Iran that it "shall not procure or develop nuclear weapons".

But three weeks after it was signed, Trump declared the ceasefire "over" and the countries have since been exchanging strikes again.

Today the president threatened that the US would destroy Iran's bridges and power plants if attacks on Hormuz persist while Tehran warned the US against targeting its nuclear facilities.

Nir Barkat, Israel’s minister of economy, says Israel "can manage it" if Saudi Arabia has nuclear power for peaceful means.

"If they want it for peaceful purposes - we can manage it. The Americans do not want to endanger Israel. Netanyahu and Trump know how to maneuver without taking risks," he tells Israeli military radio.

Israeli heritage minister Amichay Eliyahu says Israel will do "as much as [it] can" to ensure no Middle Eastern country develops a nuclear weapon.

"Saudi Arabia today is in a good direction, [but] tomorrow it could reverse on us," Eliyahu tells Israeli public broadcaster Kan.

But former Israeli defence and foreign minister, Avigor Liberman, is urging the Israeli government to "act decisively" to halt the deal.

"Saudi Arabia’s civilian nuclear program will ultimately result in nuclear weapons," Liberman wrote on X earlier today, adding that this would lead to a "mad arms race throughout the entire Middle East."

For context: Israel is widely believed to have nuclear weapons, but it neither confirms nor denies whether this is the case.

Image source, Reuters

William Patey, former British ambassador to Saudi Arabia, says he thinks Saudi Arabia is not interested in nuclear weapons unless "Iran was to acquire them".

Speaking to BBC News, he says the country has been clear "over the years" that were Iran to get nuclear weapons, it would "seek to do the same".

"They have a genuine need for civilian nuclear power," he says, adding that Saudi Arabia uses a "tremendous" amount of its own oil and gas to generate electricity and they are seeking to reduce this dependence.

"The US is their preferred source" for this nuclear technology, he adds.

America appears to have "conceded quite a bit", Patey says, referencing reports the US could allow for the Saudis to enrich uranium themselves.

Patey says he is not sure why any such concessions would have been made, but speculates it may be a commercial choice as the Saudi's could cut a deal with China or other countries instead.

Image source, The Washington Post via Getty Images

Brad Sherman, Democrat representative from California, says the US should only approve a deal if it has the the "same gold-standard safeguards as our deal with the UAE".

Under that deal in 2009, the UAE does not produce its own uranium.

"A President waging war to prevent nuclear proliferation in the Middle East should not facilitate proliferation just because US companies stand to make a profit," Sherman writes on X.

Republican representative Marlin Stutzman tells CNN that he has no "initial" concerns with the agreement, but would want to "hear more intelligence".

"You know, the Saudis are really the stable balance in the Middle East", he says, describing Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salmana a "friend" of the West and America.

Also speaking to CNN, Democrat John Garamendi describes the deal as "terrible, terrible policy", adding that "we should never, ever do this".

"Enriched uranium can be made into a nuclear weapon. This is really, really bad, bad policy," he says.

Opponents of Trump's deal are unlikely to defeat itpublished at 18:40 BST

18:40 BST

Sarah Smith
North America editor

Image source, Reuters

The nuclear deal is a commercial agreement for US companies to run nuclear power plants in Saudi Arabia rather than giving the technology to the country.

A nuclear deal of this kind has been under discussion for years. It was envisaged as part of a wider agreement that would include Saudi diplomatic recognition of Israel.

But, according to reports, US President Donald Trump has not made that a condition of the deal. Instead, he has reportedly agreed that Saudi Arabia may be allowed to enrich uranium on their own soil, as well as accepting terms that could limit international inspectors from accessing nuclear sites in the country.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio, on a visit to the Philippines, addressed concerns about the deal.

"Suffice it to say, the US is not going to reach any agreement with any country in the world that leads to the risk of proliferation," he said.

A similar deal with the United Arab Emirates, in 2009, was much more restrictive with stringent inspections and no right to produce its own nuclear fuel.

The highly controversial agreement will need to be debated in congress but opponents are unlikely to be able to gather enough votes to defeat President Trump's initiative.

Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, Saudi Arabia’s de facto leader, has said that he would seek to build nuclear weapons if Iran does so.

The deal set to be announced by the US and Saudi Arabia relates to the generation of nuclear energy - not weapons.

But as we've been reporting, some opponents of the deal fear it could lead to nuclear proliferation - the spread of nuclear weapons to more countries.

Currently only nine countries are known to have nuclear weapons. This count includes Israel, which is widely believed to have them, but does not confirm or deny possessing nuclear weapons.

Lisa Lambert
Live reporter

When the first reports of the deal started emerging, a nuclear nonproliferation expert at the national security think tank Foundation for Defense of Democracies warned it would be "bad".

"Congress should block it," Andrea Stricker, posted on X.

"If it does not, one hopes the policy will be reversed by a subsequent administration before too much damage is done in terms of watering down safeguards, setting negative precedents for other states, and failing to contain the spread of enrichment and reprocessing—which we just put back in the box in Iran via force," she added.

Stricker called the 2009 deal with Saudi Arabia's neighbour, the United Arab Emirates - in which the UAE does not produce its own fuel and accepts a host of other restrictions - "the gold standard", and warned that the agreement to be announced would "demolish" that standard.

Some fear this deal could trigger a nuclear arms race in the Middle Eastpublished at 17:59 BST

17:59 BST

Frank Gardner
Security correspondent

Image source, Maxar

This deal is controversial.

The reason why the US is doing this is two-fold. It has a commercial interest, because American firms are going to make money out of it.

But partly it's to keep Saudi Arabia within its strategic sphere of interest.

The United Arab Emirates got the South Koreans to help them in this area, as well as the US.

If Washington turned down a Saudi request for help with their civil nuclear programme then the Saudis could turn to the Chinese to help them.

Saudi Arabia already has a nascent civil nuclear programme, and its big regional rival just across the Gulf is the Islamic Republic of Iran which, as we know, has a very advanced one.

This deal comes as a war is raging nearby in the Gulf and many countries are saying to Iran, you can't enrich your own uranium or you can't be trusted to.

The fear is that if Saudi Arabia starts enriching its own uranium, that could just encourage hardliners in Iran to secretly race to build a bomb.

It could also, potentially, trigger a nuclear arms race in the region with Egypt and Turkey stepping up their own programmes.

Image source, Bloomberg via Getty Images

The deal set to be announced the US and Saudi Arabia will focus on nuclear power generation, according to CBS.

Saudi Arabia generated an estimated 453 terawatt hours (TWh) of electricity in 2023, with 62% from natural gas, 38% from oil, and less than 1% from renewables, according to data from the US Energy Information Administration (EIA).

Saudi Arabia currently has no nuclear power plants, but, in September 2023, its energy minister reiterated the country's intentions to build one.

Kwasi Gyamfi Asiedu
Live reporter

Image source, Handout/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images

The US-Saudi relationship has undergone radical change in the last few years.

Four years ago this month, former President Joe Biden gave an awkward fist bump to the Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.

It came after Biden previously vowed to make the Gulf nation a "pariah" following US intelligence conclusions that the crown prince personally ordered the killing and dismemberment of US-based journalist and critic Jamal Khashoggi in Turkey.

But as the Russia-Ukraine war sent oil prices soaring, Biden turned to Saudi Arabia, the world's leading oil exporter, to help stabilise oil prices. At a future meeting, the pair shook hands but a warm relationship was slow to materialise.

Since returning to the White House, President Donald Trump has worked to cultivate a closer relationship. One of his first major foreign trips was to Saudi Arabia in May 2025 - where Saudi companies reportedly pledged $600bn in investment.

Last November, Trump warmly welcomed bin Salman to the White House with a personal greeting on a red carpet, a military flyover, and a tour of the presidential mansion. The president also speaks very fondly about Saudi leaders, frequently claiming that King Salman bin Abdulaziz told him the US was "a dead country" under Biden.

In recent months, Saudi Arabia has found itself in the firing line of Iranain attacks, and its energy exports have been disrupted, after the US launched attacks on Iran.

Image source, Getty Images

Image source, Getty Images

Talks on the United States and Saudi Arabia co-operating on a civil nuclear programme go back as far as 2008.

Under the Bush administration, the two countries signed a nonbinding memorandum of understanding (MoU), with the US saying it would assist the Gulf kingdom to develop civilian nuclear energy but that Saudi Arabia has stated it intended to import nuclear fuel and would not pursue "sensitive nuclear technologies".

Here's some of the key milestones since then:

• From 2017 to 2019, the US granted seven American companies authorisation to engage in "civil nuclear discussions" with Saudi Arabia
• However, in 2020 the US Government Accountability Office reported that the two nations had "not made significant progress" due to "persistent differences" over conditions including restrictions on enrichment
• In 2022, the US and Saudi signed a new MoU on "the exchange of technical information and cooperation in nuclear safety matters"
• In 2023, the Wall Street Journal reported that the US was considering a US-run uranium enrichment operation within Saudi Arabia
• In November 2025, the US and Saudi Arabia signed a joint declaration which the Trump administration said "builds the legal foundation for a decades-long, multi-billion-dollar nuclear energy partnership"

One of the key points of the deal, according to reports in US media, is that Saudi Arabia may be allowed to enrich uranium itself rather than relying on imported fuel.

This would reportedly take place at a US-built uranium enrichment facility within Saudi Arabia, and stands out as a key difference compared to the US's nuclear deal with the United Arab Emirates.

Under this 2009 agreement, the UAE does not produce its own fuel and also faces a number of other restrictions.

Washington and Riyadh are set to announce they have reached a deal that would see Saudi Arabia able to develop nuclear power for the first time.

The two countries have reached a commercial agreement for US companies to run nuclear power plants on Saudi Arabian soil, a regional official familiar with the agreement told the BBC's US partner, CBS News.

An official announcement is expected later today.

The deal may allow the Saudis to enrich their own fuel for nuclear reactors, CBS reports.

The companies involved have not yet been disclosed, but Congress would need to be consulted, according to CBS.

The BBC has asked the White House for comment.