| You are in: Talking Point | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tuesday, 27 November, 2001, 10:36 GMT Education Bill: More freedom or more upheaval? ![]() Secondary schools in England could enjoy greater freedom in the way they work, according to proposals in the government's Education Bill. The bill, published on Friday, introduces new schemes for raising standards. Schools could be given the power to lengthen the school day and year or to form partnerships with other schools and share teachers. It could also pave the way for schools to become entrepreneurs. One pilot school in Shropshire earns millions of pounds from its online technology course. Other schools could soon do the same. But teachers say innovation requires money and more teachers, both of which are in short supply. And parents have expressed their concern at too much experimentation with the education of their children. Is this a breath of fresh air in the school system? Do teachers and parents need more freedom and flexibility? Or does it create instability and uncertainty? This debate is now closed. Read your comments below. Your reaction:
Dr John Brennan, UK I am a school governor, so I know that schools are currently hard pressed. If I really believed the government was sincere in what they say I might support it, but the steady expansion of prescribed activities (literacy hour, numeracy hour and so on) demonstrates that what the government really want is absolute control, while retaining the ability to blame the teachers if things fail. The only bright spot is that at least the current government believes in state education to some degree. My training is in control systems. I see education as a complex multivariable system with many unknowns and several very long time delays. Common sense dictates that you control such a system by applying very small control inputs. Constant, rapid changes to inputs will result in chronic instability. Perhaps the Department for Education would do well to hire a couple of control systems engineers who can explain this to them in simple terms. Who will do all this innovation? - yes, yet again, the hard pressed classroom teacher. Many of the government's flagship schemes and policies for UK education have only been implemented in England. There is no national curriculum in Scotland, Ofsted and specialist schools aren't found in any other part of the UK. Yet despite this 'disadvantage' standards in these countries are rising. In part due to the fact that they offer higher pay and better conditions. Will this latest scheme lead to improved conditions and standards or just be a case of style over substance or change for changes sake?
David cooper, UK As an educator, this smells of two-tier education. Those that can raise money get more, those that struggle are left to suffer. Yes - free up schools - let them become independent, run themselves and succeed - or fail - on their merits. An end to fixed pay scales for teachers, a rigidly fixed curriculum and the failed "one-size-tries-to-fit-all- but-really-fits-nobody" approach of the bog-standard comprehensive. Go to it - your children will thank you for it!
Simon Mallett, UK Our schools don't need more 'freedom' or 'flexibility'; they need more staff and resources! My wife is a schoolteacher. Before introducing 'innovations', schools first need some obvious basic measures to be carried out. These are: to pay teachers a fair wage compared to other professions - in order to attract and to keep good staff - and to give teachers sufficient time to spend on teaching instead of continually changing things and introducing new tests and paperwork.
Learning should be fun and useful. Kids should foster a real appreciation and love of learning with a relevant curriculum based a lot on what interests them. Let's give teachers more say and allow for creativity and initiatives within the classroom. Perhaps then we'll produce responsible citizens who can go out and live into the world rather than fight against a system in which you are judged on GCSE and A level grades. More freedom sounds good at face value, until one realises that it is just another way for the government to abdicate its responsibilities and hand over power to big business via PFI. This is simply applying fundamentalist capitalist ideology to the general education of future generations - it's just another way of making some schools better than others. Creating elitism and advantage for a minority of already advantaged schoolchildren from a very early age is a disgraceful way of creating showcase schools in the name of government propaganda. I feel the continuous changes in the education system have completely destroyed my son's education. He had so much potential a few years ago, but now seems to have gone off the rails. I have half a mind to keep him at home and teach him myself.
David Harris, UK Hang on a moment, innovation is great and will teach the kids lots, but would longer school years mean dumping even more work on teachers who are at breaking point as it is. I think we need to have a rethink on this one. I think it's about time politicians stopped messing about with education and left the people who know what they are doing to get on with the job. For too long now (at least 30 years to my knowledge) there have been endless changes of emphasis and new "initiatives", most of which show anything but initiative. For once, politicians on all sides should lay off the education system and stop seeing it as an opportunity to make a name for themselves. |
See also: Internet links: The BBC is not responsible for the content of external internet sites Other Talking Points: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Links to more Talking Point stories |
| ^^ Back to top News Front Page | World | UK | UK Politics | Business | Sci/Tech | Health | Education | Entertainment | Talking Point | In Depth | AudioVideo ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- To BBC Sport>> | To BBC Weather>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- © MMIII|News Sources|Privacy | ||